Legal Support in Anti-Doping Hearings: Unequal Access, Uneven Process
July 23, 2025A review done by the Anti-Doping Database shows that many athletes often attend hearings alone, or accompanied by a parent, coach, or agent - not a legal professional. This is a structural imbalance and not fair play.
The imbalance is clear. On one side is the athlete, often unrepresented or assisted by a parent, coach, or agent. On the other side is the anti-doping organization or international federation, commonly represented by legal staff, and in some cases also by external counsel from law firms. The hearing panel itself typically includes at least one legal professional. In many cases, all parties involved have legal training. Except the athlete.
Equal Means: A Core Principle in Theory
International recommendations emphasize procedural fairness in anti-doping proceedings. The Council of Europe’s Recommendation T-DO/Rec(2017)01 and Recommendation CM/Rec(2022)14 highlight the principle of “equality of arms,” defined as ensuring that each party has a fair opportunity to present their case under conditions that do not create a significant disadvantage.
Anti-doping authorities typically have access to legal departments, external lawyers, and internal case databases. These may contain relevant precedents or similar case outcomes, many of which are not publicly available.
Athletes facing a charge are often unaware of these resources and have no structured way to access them. In cases where the sanction may extend up to four years, the ability to prepare a complete defence varies widely depending on what support the athlete can obtain.
Legal Aid Availability Varies by Country
While the right to legal representation is guaranteed in principle, the conditions for accessing such support differ across jurisdictions. Some countries provide legal aid only to athletes who meet strict eligibility criteria based on sporting results or income level. This can exclude athletes from less prominent sports, or those who earn modest additional income through part-time work.
Where no structured legal aid system exists, some athletes rely on lawyers who take cases pro bono. While this does happen in several countries, the arrangement depends on individual initiative and availability, and is not universally accessible.
Subject-Matter Expertise Matters
Not all legal assistance is equal. Anti-doping proceedings involve a specific legal framework that differs significantly from general civil or criminal law. Terms like Provisional Suspension, Results Management, Substantial Assistance, and No Fault or Negligence have precise meanings under the World Anti-Doping Code (WADC). Lawyers unfamiliar with these concepts may inadvertently harm an athlete’s case by misunderstanding procedures or missing critical deadlines.
In one recent case, the athlete’s lawyer was unfamiliar with the concept of Provisional Suspension—a temporary ban applied before a final decision is made. Misunderstanding such basic procedural elements can have consequences for the athlete's eligibility and defence options.
Several countries and organizations maintain lists of lawyers who have training or experience in anti-doping matters. These services are often offered on a pro bono basis, but only when the lawyer has relevant subject-matter knowledge does it become meaningful support in practice.
Examples of National Legal Aid Models
Several countries have developed more formalized systems. In Finland, the Finnish Sports Law Association administers a legal aid program funded by the Ministry of Education and Culture. Athletes can apply for support by paying a deductible of €100, while the state covers legal costs up to €600 per case. A list of 4–6 lawyers is maintained, and information about the scheme is provided to the athlete in the initial case notification.
In Azerbaijan, the national anti-doping agency (AMADA) has established a pro bono policy in partnership with local law firms. The policy prioritizes applicants based on factors such as age, disability, or financial hardship, and includes a dedicated coordinator and legal education seminars for athletes. Legal representation is provided throughout the results management process and any hearings.
These initiatives show that structured access to legal aid is feasible even with limited financial resources, and may contribute to more consistent procedural protection.
Legal Framework, Practical Access
Athletes are subject to complex regulatory frameworks, and outcomes of anti-doping proceedings can have long-term consequences. Rules and deadlines are strict, and procedural errors can affect both sanction length and eligibility for reductions. Navigating these processes requires specific legal knowledge that may not be available to athletes without support.
Some athletes may not be aware of their right to legal assistance, or may be informed too late to make use of it. Others may not know where to find a qualified lawyer with anti-doping experience.
Several organizations have proposed the creation of national lists of available legal professionals with relevant expertise. Making such lists accessible and clearly informing athletes early in the process are recurring recommendations from anti-doping oversight bodies.
Further Reading and Legal Aid Resources
Several organizations and governing bodies offer legal aid or pro bono support for athletes involved in anti-doping proceedings. The following links provide more information about available programs, policies, and guidance:
International and Sport-Wide Resources
-
Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) – Legal Aid Program
-
Sport Resolutions (UK) – Pro Bono Service
-
Canadian Sport Dispute Resolution Centre – Pro Bono Program
-
HIWU (Horseracing Integrity & Welfare Unit) – Pro Bono Legal Support
-
USOPC Ombuds Office – Athlete Legal Aid Program
-
Professional Tennis Players Association (PTPA) – ACE Program Legal Support
-
BBC Article (2024): Pro bono legal help in tennis misconduct cases
-
2 Hare Court (Law Firm) – Commentary on pro bono for tennis players
-
The Sports Integrity Initiative – 2020 article on pro bono use in UK anti-doping cases
National Anti-Doping Organizations
-
Azerbaijan (AMADA) – Legal Aid Policy
-
Finland (FINCIS) – Legal Aid Mechanism (PDF via iNADO)
-
Norway (ADNO) – Structure of the Prosecution Committee (PDF via iNADO)
-
International Ice Hockey Federation (IIHF) – Legal Aid Program
For Legal Professionals: Access to Data
Working on anti-doping cases requires knowledge of past rulings, sanction patterns, and case-specific precedent.
The Anti-Doping Database provides access to thousands of doping decisions from around the world, structured for legal research and case comparison.
Learn more about our offers to lawyers who are representing an athlete in a doping hearing: antidopingdatabase.com/for-sport-lawyers